Foreword

It is a particular pleasure to introduce readers to this special patent-themed issue of the Boston College Law Review. In response to the number of excellent and publishable articles on patent law they received this last cycle, the Law Review editors decided to dedicate an entire issue to this timely and important subject. It is […]

Read More :: View PDF

Dubious Patent Reform

Abstract: The 2011 America Invents Act sought to drastically improve the American patent system by creating new review processes for already issued patents. These processes were meant to reduce patent litigation costs and clear the field of “dubious patents,” all the while increasing certainty in the existence and scope of patent rights. Though this was […]

Read More :: View PDF

The Completeness Requirement in Patent Law

Abstract: This Article argues that courts have created a de facto extra-statutory condition of patentability, herein termed the “completeness” requirement. This requirement bars patents on certain inventions whose chief value lies in their function as inputs into downstream research. The Article contends that the notion of completeness explains doctrinal innovations that are difficult to rationalize […]

Read More :: View PDF

When Nominal is Reasonable: Damages for the Unpracticed Patent

Abstract: To obtain a substantial patent damage award a patentee need not commercialize the patented invention; the patentee need only show that its patent was infringed. This surely incentivizes patenting but it dis-incentivizes innovation. Why commercialize yourself? The law allows you to wait for others to take the risks, and then you emerge later to […]

Read More :: View PDF

Inter Partes Review as a Shield for Technology Purchasers: A Response to Gaia Bernstein’s The Rise of the End-User in Patent Litigation

Abstract: In her Article, The Rise of the End User in Patent Litigation, Professor Bernstein makes the case for legislative and judicial action designed to protect technology users from abusive patent enforcement that exploits their relative lack of resources and technical knowledge. This Essay presents the findings of an empirical study designed to determine the […]

Read More :: View PDF

Drive at Your Own Risk: Uber’s Misrepresentations to UberX Drivers About Insurance Coverage Violate California’s Unfair Competition Law

Abstract: Ride-sharing services such as Uber and Lyft have revolutionized the private transportation market. Given the lack of clear regulations over these businesses, however, insurance industry experts disagree with Uber about the adequacy of uberX drivers’ existing insurance coverage. This Note asserts that Uber misleads uberX drivers about the type and amount of coverage available […]

Read More :: View PDF