Abstract: On July 10, 2012, in Dandamudi v. Tisch, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit struck down New York Education Law section 6805(1)(6), reasoning that it violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The law explicitly denied legal, nonimmigrant aliens the ability to apply for a license to practice as a pharmacist in New York. The Second Circuit’s decision diverged from those of other circuits that have held similar laws targeting nonimmigrant aliens to be constitutional. This Comment argues that the Second Circuit’s decision in Dandamudi faithfully comports with Supreme Court Equal Protection Clause precedent. Further, it asserts that the Dandamudi court’s ruling is a much-needed affirmation of nonimmigrant aliens’ right to work and contribute productively to American society.
Volume LVI Board of Editors Announced
We are pleased to announce the Board of Editors for the 2014-2015 academic year: Volume 56 Board of Editors […]
BCLR Releases Vol. LV No. 2
The Boston College Law Review is pleased to publish the March 2014 issue. Here are summaries of this issue’s Articles and […]
BCLR Moves to # 25 in Law Journal Rankings
The Boston College Law Review has moved from #26 to #25 in the annual Washington and Lee University School of Law Law […]