Abstract: Using Martti Koskenniemi’s theory about international law as a starting point, this Article examines how the interpretive heritage of the World Trade Organization (WTO) constrains the interpretive options available for understanding the WTO rules. First, this Article describes Koskenniemi’s critique of international law as being in permanent conflict between visions of international law as utopia and as apology. It then examines how Koskenniemi’s theory, which was originally published before the WTO’s creation, would apply to the WTO. Finally, it concludes that, in the context of the WTO, the WTO’s interpretive culture restrains the slide between visions of utopia and apology that Koskenniemi claimed.
BCLR Moves to # 25 in Law Journal Rankings
The Boston College Law Review has moved from #26 to #25 in the annual Washington and Lee University School of Law Law […]
Alumni-Student Happy Hour, February 19
Dear BCLR Alumni, I am pleased to announce that the Boston College Law Review will be hosting its Alumni-Student Happy […]
2014 E. Supp. Now Available
We have begun posting case comments from recent federal appellate decisions to our 2014 E. Supp., which can be found […]